NY Times: It’s No Longer Necessary to Spend a Grand to Wipe Tushes
I was doing some back reading of articles I bookmarked last week & in my cue was a New York Times article, For Firstborns, Secondhand Fits the Bill. I had bookmarked it to read because I am looking for articles to give my students when school starts back up. I’m trying to find some that deal with how changes in the economy can cause other social changes.
In this article the focus is a supposed increase in frugal choices when shopping for kids. I know the NY Times has a pretty skewed audience, trending toward a higher income & higher educational level. I get there are differences in cultural understandings about money & necessity based on socio-economic class. But PULEEZE if this is what money & education gets us then we are totally screwed on lessons of sensible economics. For example as the article points out that parents who have it “together” have realized this stunning fact:
No longer is it necessary to buy a thousand-dollar changing table in order to prove your parental savvy and breadth of love; if anything, the opposite is true.
I’m not sure anyone in my classes will be able to relate, no matter their age or if they have kids. I know I can’t. Because really a grand?
Is this really a newsflash? I don’t know about anyone else, but I don’t think it was EVER necessary to buy a $1,000 changing table. Not unless your kid is going to create literal diamonds on it, which I’m pretty sure is impossible. Rainbows maybe, but diamonds nope. No diamonds then no grand is going to be dropped so I can wipe a tush.
I’ve always wondered who spent a grand on things like that.
I didn’t even have a changing table for my kids!
Visiting from sits.
[Reply]
a grand?!?! and i thought $150 was a lot!! that’s just irritating to me.…how can people drop that much for a doo doo table?!
[Reply]
a majority of Americans are totally screwed on lessons of sensible economics. I wonder why? whats the obsession with THINGS?! I was like that when I was younger and dumber…but I have seen the light! : )
[Reply]
“Parents who have it ‘together,’” HUH!! A grand, are you serious? We could all think of so many things that we NEED that would be money well spent.
Glad you got the google follower link up. I’m following.
[Reply]
Oh, for Pete’s sake. I don’t know ANYONE who bought a $1,000 changing table. That’s just ridiculous. Most people expecting kids get the fact that they’re about to get punched right where it hurts — in the wallet. They spend a little more wisely than that… At least I hope they do.
[Reply]
Stopping by from SITS to give a little blog ♥
That is ridiculous to spend so much money on such a thing!
[Reply]
Visiting from SITS — No we never, ever considered a grand for a changing table. That is one seriously screwed demographic.
[Reply]
This is probably one of the big reasons our country is in the kind of debt that we are…
[Reply]
Some people have TOO MUCH money. I think they should be required to give it to some of us before they buy a diaper genie for 500 bucks.
[Reply]
[…] we have learned to do even though we never were big spenders. But after reading there are couples in the NY area who apparently could spend a $1,000 on a changing table it makes me wonder if there aren’t a lot people whose expenses could be cut out to lower that […]