Glamour, Body Image, and the Loving Your Body Revolution.

by beth on October 5, 2009

Photo by Matthias Vriens-McGrath in Novem­ber 2009 issue of Glamour

Glam­our mag­a­zine in its Novem­ber 2009 edi­tion, on stands now, has decided to fea­ture a spread of “plus sized” mod­els. I put quo­ta­tions around plus sized because in the mod­el­ing & fash­ion world that is really any­thing about a size 6. Talk about unre­al­is­tic stan­dards & for a mag­a­zine like Glam­our we aren’t talk­ing mod­el­ing high cou­ture fash­ion that is directed toward a more high art sense of fash­ion this fash­ion to actu­ally wear. It’s mar­keted toward the “aver­age” per­son but still the stan­dards that have been part of the indus­try are any­thing but average.

The fea­ture of these women in Glam­our was sparked by Lizzi Miller’s pic­ture on page 194 in the Sep­tem­ber issue. When I wrote it about that  I was hop­ing it would trans­late into some­thing real and sus­tain­able in the mar­ket­ing & sell­ing of beauty.  I don’t fault nat­u­rally thin women for being fea­tured in media.  I believe those bod­ies are equally beau­ti­ful when they are nat­ural & I don’t want thin women to go any­where (love your thin self!).

How­ever, there are a lot of women in all forms of media & fash­ion who have to actively con­trol every­thing they eat, hide food, or deny them­selves food in order to meet unre­al­is­tic expec­ta­tions.  Women in every­day life do the same thing, that is not healthy or beau­ti­ful.  It can even be an extremely seri­ous dis­or­der. I believe unre­al­is­tic pres­sures & expec­ta­tions of women hav­ing to meet a rigid body image & beauty fea­tured in media (one that is con­structed through pho­to­shop, mind you) doesn’t help any­one.  Media helps to reflect and shape cul­tural atti­tudes, it’s a major social insti­tu­tion.  We can’t deny the power it can have in the dis­course on body image.

There­fore, I am happy to see this fea­ture. I believe that the fea­ture spread of mod­els who are not the “fash­ion world norm” is a step, but it’s a long way from see­ing body diver­sity in media.  I mean all out body diver­sity, not just some able-bodied size 10–14 women who looked like Glama­zons. Instead, fea­tur­ing the wide range of beauty and bod­ies that exist in the world could really open up how we con­struct beauty ideals in the 21st century.

I don’t think a fea­ture like Glam­our has done will do this auto­mat­i­cally.  I’m not naive & know that money will ulti­mately do the talk­ing. If peo­ple buy it, more diverse images will be shown.  But still it’s a step, a step toward see­ing a reflec­tion of the real­ity that beauty comes in a lot of dif­fer­ent bod­ies.  And maybe, just maybe, the world won’t come to a screech­ing halt if peo­ple see that real­ity of diverse body beauty in the mag­a­zines, com­mer­cials, shows, and other media out­lets they inter­act with.

What do you think about it? Will you buy the magazine?

Did you like this? Share it:

{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }

1 marymac October 5, 2009 at 2:42 pm

um, if THEY’RE plus size what am i? Jumbo? Ha! I’m a size 14- the AVERAGE AMERICAN SIZE, not that you’d know it by picking up ANY magazine in the universe!
oops- i’m ranting on your blog, aren’t i? omg, sorry. that pic just kinda shocked me tho! So my vote is NO, I wouldn’t buy the magazine unless it included real size women! I applaud you for bringing up the issue. Bravo! Now I need to go eat some chocolate because this talk is making me hungry! ;)

Reply

2 parenting BY dummies October 5, 2009 at 2:56 pm

I’ll buy this edition b/c I already did ages ago when I got a subscription. But, would I buy it b/c of this spread? Not necessarily. I’m not rooting for or against this attempt @ a revolution on what’s pretty and what’s not. I’ve got a pretty good understanding about what I think is hot. I’m kinda biased though b/c I hate looking at my Fatty McFatterton back (and belly, and thigh, and chin) rolls in the mirror and I highly doubt that Glamour putting photos of similarly shaped women in their pages is gonna make me like my Santa belly anymore than I do right now. And, I’m a huge blog comment section hog, so please for give my Boggarting of your space:)

Reply

3 Jules October 5, 2009 at 4:30 pm

I agree, those women look great but I don’t feel they are the “average” American woman.

Reply

4 blueviolet October 5, 2009 at 4:54 pm

I saw a segment on Ellen about this. It’ll be interesting to see if this will continue or if they’ll revert back to the typical skinnies.

Reply

5 Alicia October 5, 2009 at 5:00 pm

i think it’s great that they are covering the spectrum a bit more…but i don’t think they need the photo to do it…but still, props to them for opening our minds to it.

Reply

6 Lisa @ All That and a Box of Rocks October 5, 2009 at 6:27 pm

I think it’s great, but only if they keep it up and show ‘real’ women. This photo is not the typical ‘real’ plus size lady!

Come by and visit my blog~there’s an award waiting for you!

Reply

7 Dawn October 5, 2009 at 6:40 pm

When I think “Plus” I don’t think of those models. I still don’t know if they could be considered “real”. But definitely an improvement over the Kate Moss standard.

There’s an award for you on my blog! (Don’t worry, you don’t have to do anything with it, just know I enjoy your blog!)

Reply

8 Unknown Mami October 5, 2009 at 11:38 pm

I subscribe to Glamour so I’ll be getting it for sure.

I value diversity in everything. We should all be represented.

Reply

9 Nyx October 6, 2009 at 10:46 am

I think that this can only be a step in a positive direction.

Reply

10 Mother Mayhem October 7, 2009 at 8:13 am

There’s a revolution going on? I must have missed the memo…

I’m a plus sized woman. Evidently I’m not “average” because there’s no way I’m posing nude ANYWHERE. Snicker.

Reply

11 Simply Mommy October 11, 2009 at 10:18 am

I would buy the issue. Please I hope no one takes offense to what I am about to say. I do believe this picture is of average size women. But I dont believe they should be considered plus size women at all. I think we need to change the image of what our society thinks is average and ideal. Is a size 0 ideal NO but a size 16 isnt either. Today the amount of children truly overweight has skyrocketed. If you are naturally tall and very thin great but most women aren’t. And many models are naturally tall but do many things to look so thin. Its just not the norm and it shouldnt be. On the other hand I dont think we should portray that being truly plus size is what women should strive for either. But in the end what is most important in being healthy and happy. I think this is definitely a start in the right direction and it makes my happy. There is still a long way to go. I found you on MBC and glad I did!!

Reply

12 beth October 16, 2009 at 11:56 am

Definitely no offense taken. I am for healthy images of women, not extremes that are gained from unhealthy practices on either side.

Reply

13 La Jolla Mom October 15, 2009 at 9:25 pm

Did you know that Kate Dillon (this Glamour pic in middle on right, redish hair) is my sister in law? She would love that you wrote this. I’ll forward it to her. Also @K8Dillon and on Oprah on Wednesday. Gosh I sound like her publicist. ;)

Reply

14 beth October 16, 2009 at 11:55 am

That’s so cool! I hope she likes this. It is an issue that I am passionate about. Her being in this public photo is a great step for showing more images of beauty.

Reply

15 Lois October 24, 2009 at 3:58 am

I’ve always been a fan of plus-size models! There’s a great site with many images of Kate and other plus-size models here:

http://www.judgmentofparis.com/

They’re all gorgeous.

The site’s forum also has thought-provoking discussions about body image and the media.

Reply

16 Center for Eating Disorders at Sheppard Pratt November 11, 2009 at 4:46 pm

Like previously mentioned, these women may be plus-confidence and plus-beauty but they technically are not plus-size. They represent the average size of American women today. Despite the title, we applaud this step in the right direction, that Glamour has taken, has taken, and hope that it continues to create opportunities to provide education about the beauty of body diversity and the related issues of health at every size!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: