Photo by Matthias Vriens-McGrath in November 2009 issue of Glamour
Glamour magazine in its November 2009 edition, on stands now, has decided to feature a spread of “plus sized” models. I put quotations around plus sized because in the modeling & fashion world that is really anything about a size 6. Talk about unrealistic standards & for a magazine like Glamour we aren’t talking modeling high couture fashion that is directed toward a more high art sense of fashion this fashion to actually wear. It’s marketed toward the “average” person but still the standards that have been part of the industry are anything but average.
The feature of these women in Glamour was sparked by Lizzi Miller’s picture on page 194 in the September issue. When I wrote it about that I was hoping it would translate into something real and sustainable in the marketing & selling of beauty. I don’t fault naturally thin women for being featured in media. I believe those bodies are equally beautiful when they are natural & I don’t want thin women to go anywhere (love your thin self!).
However, there are a lot of women in all forms of media & fashion who have to actively control everything they eat, hide food, or deny themselves food in order to meet unrealistic expectations. Women in everyday life do the same thing, that is not healthy or beautiful. It can even be an extremely serious disorder. I believe unrealistic pressures & expectations of women having to meet a rigid body image & beauty featured in media (one that is constructed through photoshop, mind you) doesn’t help anyone. Media helps to reflect and shape cultural attitudes, it’s a major social institution. We can’t deny the power it can have in the discourse on body image.
Therefore, I am happy to see this feature. I believe that the feature spread of models who are not the “fashion world norm” is a step, but it’s a long way from seeing body diversity in media. I mean all out body diversity, not just some able-bodied size 10–14 women who looked like Glamazons. Instead, featuring the wide range of beauty and bodies that exist in the world could really open up how we construct beauty ideals in the 21st century.
I don’t think a feature like Glamour has done will do this automatically. I’m not naive & know that money will ultimately do the talking. If people buy it, more diverse images will be shown. But still it’s a step, a step toward seeing a reflection of the reality that beauty comes in a lot of different bodies. And maybe, just maybe, the world won’t come to a screeching halt if people see that reality of diverse body beauty in the magazines, commercials, shows, and other media outlets they interact with.
What do you think about it? Will you buy the magazine?






{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }
um, if THEY’RE plus size what am i? Jumbo? Ha! I’m a size 14- the AVERAGE AMERICAN SIZE, not that you’d know it by picking up ANY magazine in the universe!
oops- i’m ranting on your blog, aren’t i? omg, sorry. that pic just kinda shocked me tho! So my vote is NO, I wouldn’t buy the magazine unless it included real size women! I applaud you for bringing up the issue. Bravo! Now I need to go eat some chocolate because this talk is making me hungry!
I’ll buy this edition b/c I already did ages ago when I got a subscription. But, would I buy it b/c of this spread? Not necessarily. I’m not rooting for or against this attempt @ a revolution on what’s pretty and what’s not. I’ve got a pretty good understanding about what I think is hot. I’m kinda biased though b/c I hate looking at my Fatty McFatterton back (and belly, and thigh, and chin) rolls in the mirror and I highly doubt that Glamour putting photos of similarly shaped women in their pages is gonna make me like my Santa belly anymore than I do right now. And, I’m a huge blog comment section hog, so please for give my Boggarting of your space:)
I agree, those women look great but I don’t feel they are the “average” American woman.
I saw a segment on Ellen about this. It’ll be interesting to see if this will continue or if they’ll revert back to the typical skinnies.
i think it’s great that they are covering the spectrum a bit more…but i don’t think they need the photo to do it…but still, props to them for opening our minds to it.
I think it’s great, but only if they keep it up and show ‘real’ women. This photo is not the typical ‘real’ plus size lady!
Come by and visit my blog~there’s an award waiting for you!
When I think “Plus” I don’t think of those models. I still don’t know if they could be considered “real”. But definitely an improvement over the Kate Moss standard.
There’s an award for you on my blog! (Don’t worry, you don’t have to do anything with it, just know I enjoy your blog!)
I subscribe to Glamour so I’ll be getting it for sure.
I value diversity in everything. We should all be represented.
I think that this can only be a step in a positive direction.
There’s a revolution going on? I must have missed the memo…
I’m a plus sized woman. Evidently I’m not “average” because there’s no way I’m posing nude ANYWHERE. Snicker.
I would buy the issue. Please I hope no one takes offense to what I am about to say. I do believe this picture is of average size women. But I dont believe they should be considered plus size women at all. I think we need to change the image of what our society thinks is average and ideal. Is a size 0 ideal NO but a size 16 isnt either. Today the amount of children truly overweight has skyrocketed. If you are naturally tall and very thin great but most women aren’t. And many models are naturally tall but do many things to look so thin. Its just not the norm and it shouldnt be. On the other hand I dont think we should portray that being truly plus size is what women should strive for either. But in the end what is most important in being healthy and happy. I think this is definitely a start in the right direction and it makes my happy. There is still a long way to go. I found you on MBC and glad I did!!
Definitely no offense taken. I am for healthy images of women, not extremes that are gained from unhealthy practices on either side.
Did you know that Kate Dillon (this Glamour pic in middle on right, redish hair) is my sister in law? She would love that you wrote this. I’ll forward it to her. Also @K8Dillon and on Oprah on Wednesday. Gosh I sound like her publicist.
That’s so cool! I hope she likes this. It is an issue that I am passionate about. Her being in this public photo is a great step for showing more images of beauty.
I’ve always been a fan of plus-size models! There’s a great site with many images of Kate and other plus-size models here:
http://www.judgmentofparis.com/
They’re all gorgeous.
The site’s forum also has thought-provoking discussions about body image and the media.
Like previously mentioned, these women may be plus-confidence and plus-beauty but they technically are not plus-size. They represent the average size of American women today. Despite the title, we applaud this step in the right direction, that Glamour has taken, has taken, and hope that it continues to create opportunities to provide education about the beauty of body diversity and the related issues of health at every size!